Showing 1–20 of 35 results
...As a result, the landlord had to prove that the claimed violations of the lease occurred during the six-month period that preceded October 5, 2010, when notice of eviction was given, and that those violations went uncured for thirty...
...the entire period before a tenant is “actually evicted”;12 actionable discrimination is not limited to the shorter cure period specified in a notice to cure or quit, or to any other period short of the eviction order itself.13...
...the entire period before a tenant is "actually evicted";[12] actionable discrimination is not limited to the shorter cure period specified in a notice to cure or quit, or to any other period short of the eviction order itself.[13...
...It merely entitles the landlord, at his election and after the tenant has failed to cure or vacate in the thirty day period, to begin the eviction proceedings for which notice to quit must be served pursuant to § 45-906...
In sum, what this provision says is that the lease would terminate, and that Madison could dispossess Camalier, upon expiration of the five-day period following notice, which actually occurred before Camalier’s eviction. Moreover, it is settled with us...
Here, Borger told the trial court that Nelson-Lee could not have been evicted under the June 2, 2006 Notice to Cure or Quit because she cured the excessive noise within the thirty-day period. Borger stated that the excessive...
...a period of time before the landlord can force a change in the tenancy, and yet the court— acting inconsistently — allowed a lesser quality notice to justify a unilateral rent increase than the notice required to justify an eviction. The...
...a period of time before the landlord can force a change in the tenancy, and yet the court acting inconsistently allowed a lesser quality notice to justify a unilateral rent increase than the notice required to justify an eviction. The...
...a second notice to cure when the tenant repeats the same violation after the initial cure period elapses would allow a tenant to correct a violation on the thirtieth day of the cure period and prevent eviction, but then resume...
...evict Auger by properly serving a valid notice to quit, or (2) to keep him there after terminating the existing tenancy with a valid notice to quit, exposing Auger to liability as a holdover tenant after the notice period expired...
would substitute for the landlord’s discretion a mandatory second-strike opportunity for a tenant to stay eviction by discontinuing, or not repeating, the criminal act during the thirty days following notice. We do not believe Congress meant to permit...
...evict Auger by properly serving a valid notice to quit, or (2) to keep him there after terminating the existing tenancy with a valid notice to quit, exposing Auger to liability as a holdover tenant after the notice period expired...
When a tenant, who is under an oral month-to-month lease, is served an eviction notice during the first ten days of the month for failure to pay rent, the situation is also a setup for the [tenant's...
When a tenant, who is under an oral month-to-month lease, is served an eviction notice during the first ten days of the month for failure to pay rent, the situation is also a setup for the [tenant's...
...demonstrate that he asked the tenant to make or pay for those repairs during the “cure” period after he sent his notice of eviction. The landlord’s claim that an unauthorized person was living at the residence was eliminated as...
...On March 17, the Council enacted, as part of the COVID-19 Response Emergency Amendment Act of 2020, a moratorium on evictions “[d]uring a period of time for which the Mayor has declared a public health emergency” (“the eviction...
...Fair Housing Act.” Judge Glickman does not dispute, however, that the tenant requested a stay of the eviction proceeding for the period reasonably required for the D.C. government to clean up the apartment and for the tenant to demonstrate...
...Fair Housing Act." Judge Glickman does not dispute, however, that the tenant requested a stay of the eviction proceeding for the period reasonably required for the D.C. government to clean up the apartment and for the tenant to demonstrate...
...The notice stated that the tenants had a maximum of 90 days within which to relinquish possession of their apartments. See id., § 45-1653(c)(l). The owner apparently sought to evict the tenants so that the central heating system...
...The notice stated that the tenants had a maximum of 90 days within which to relinquish possession of their apartments. See id., § 45-1653(c)(1). The owner apparently sought to evict the tenants so that the central heating system...