Showing 61–80 of 102 results
In the present case, the tenant filed a complaint with the commissioner when the landlord failed to return his security deposit. The commissioner sent notice to the landlord, pursuant to § 36a-52 (a). Although the notice was returned to the...
...The plaintiff, AMlah Bittle, appealed to the trial court from the decision of the defendant, the commissioner of the department of social services (department), denying her application for an emergency security deposit. The plaintiff, using certified mail, return receipt requested...
...The defendant agreed to return $800 of the plaintiffs $1200 security deposit no later than August 6, 2010, and the plaintiff agreed to leave the premises in “broom-clean condition” and return her keys to the defendant upon vacating.
...It ordered the plaintiff and Helen Zenon to accept reconveyance of the property and to return the defendant’s security deposit. The court also found in favor of the defendant on her counterclaim for common-law fraud or misrepresentation and...
The court appears to have interpreted these statutory provisions as allowing a landlord to substitute a fabricated accounting of damages for the return of a tenant’s security deposit in order to avoid the sanctions of § 47a-21 (d) (2...
...More recently, we have similarly stated: ‘‘Section 47a- 21 (d) (2) requires, in the circumstance where the land- lord does not return the entire security deposit, that the landlord return to the tenant both the balance of the security deposit...
...banking commissioner (commissioner) ordering that she pay to her former tenant, Sanjay Gulati (tenant), $3600 for the return of a security deposit and assessed penalties. The landlord claims that the court improperly (1) ordered her to comply with the commissioner...
Action for, inter alia, the return of a security deposit, and for other relief, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of Fairfield, Housing Session at Bridgeport, where the defendant filed a counterclaim; thereafter, the matter was tried...
...If the tenancy is terminated before the anniversary date of such tenancy, or if the landlord or owner returns all or part of a security deposit prior to termination of the tenancy, the landlord or owner shall pay the accrued...
The plaintiffs thereafter filed an action claiming unlawful retention of their security deposit under General Statutes § 47a-21 (d) (2), violation of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA), General Statutes § 42-110a et seq., and unjust enrichment. After a...
...for a used car sales license and that the defendant therefore was not liable under a lease in which a condition precedent was the approval of such an application, and (2) awarded the defendant the return of his security deposit.
With respect to the plaintiffs’ claim that the defendants failed to return their security deposit pursuant to § 47a-21 (d), the court found in favor of the plaintiffs, awarding them $4800 in damages, plus $216.56 in interest. The court...
...corporation within three months, the defendants waived this provision by failing to make a timely demand for return of the security deposit. The plaintiff claims that the parties, by their words and conduct, intended to continue their relationship. We are...
...Soon after moving in, the defendant moved out, notified the plaintiff that she had vacated the property, and requested the return of her security deposit.
...range of “housing matters” including administrative appeals, building code violations and “[a]ll actions for back rent, damages, return of security deposits and other relief arising out of the parties’ relationship as landlord and tenant or owner and occupant.” General...
...The defendant never returned the security deposit to the plaintiff or any interest that was due on the deposit.
...In light of this belief, the defendants assert that the court erroneously determined that, following the fire and a letter from the plaintiff seeking the return of both the key money payment and a portion of the security deposit, it...
...enjoyment, (3) violated the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act, General Statutes § 42-110a et seq., and (4) unlawfully withheld the plaintiffs’ security deposit. The jury returned a general verdict in favor of the plaintiffs in the amount of $44,000.
...The trial court rendered judgment in accordance with the report, which found that the plaintiff prevailed on her claim that the defendants, Anton Filipovic and Rosanda Filipovic, had failed to return her security deposit (count one), awarding $1600 plus interest...
...granted because it failed to state that the plaintiff had provided a forwarding address for the defendant to return the security deposit. The court thereafter granted the defendant’s motion to strike, finding that the plaintiff had not alleged that...