Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Showing 41–60 of 130 results

Section 31

250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005) California state

The court held that a landlord who has in good faith failed to return a security deposit as required by section 1950.5 can nonetheless recover damages for unpaid rent, repairs, and cleaning in a subsequent judicial proceeding. (Granberry v...

Aljabban v. Fontana Indoor Swap Meet, Inc. (2020)

Aljabban v. Fontana Indoor Swap Meet, Inc. (2020) California state

15 As we understand Aljabban’s claims, the failure to return $680.00 of the security deposit relates to the causes of action for breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and conversion. 28...

250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)

250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005) California state

...of the security deposit it withheld against the even greater amount of damages it sustained on account of PhotoPoint’s breach of the lease, and therefore PhotoPoint sustained no actual damages and was not entitled to return of the deposit.

Section 31

250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005) California state

...do not preclude Sherwood from attempting to establish, when the case is returned to the trial court, that the 45-day period for return of the security deposit under the lease began to run before September 3, 2001. *731 m...

250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005)

250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005) California state

rent that has accrued as of the date called for in the statute for the return of the deposit. We hold that parties to a commercial lease can waive section 1950.7 to provide that a security deposit may be...

Section 31

250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005) California state

The trial court determined that although 250 had not returned the security deposit as required under section 1950.7, 250 could nonetheless offset the deposit against the damages it sustained as a result of PhotoPoint’s breach of the lease...

section 1951

250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005) California state

...credit constitutes a “payment or deposit of money” for purposes of section 1950.7 because 250 had drawn the entire amount of the letter of credit before the security deposit was due to be returned, and 250 was thus holding...

§ 1805

Action Apartment Ass'n v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 114 Cal. Rptr. 2d 412 (2002) California state

...A petition determines whether a landlord is making a fair return under the NOI formula, not whether the interest rate on security deposits is excessive. In short, there is no available or adequate administrative remedy.

Aljabban v. Fontana Indoor Swap Meet, Inc. (2020)

Aljabban v. Fontana Indoor Swap Meet, Inc. (2020) California state

...However, in light of the evidence at trial, we do not believe that the failure to return $680.00 of the security deposit supports a judgment in favor of Aljabban on the cause of action for breach of the covenant...

§ 1805

Action Apartment Ass'n v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 114 Cal. Rptr. 2d 412 (2002) California state

...to make a fair return on their property. (See Santa Monica Charter, § 1800.) We fail to see how that purpose is served by forcing landlords to pay a higher rate of interest on security deposits than the rate prevailing in...

section 1951

250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005) California state

250 contends that section 6.A’s limitation on the use of the security deposit to cover past due rent does not apply to the portion of the security deposit represented by the letter of credit, because section 6.B...

section 6

250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005) California state

(1950) 95 Cal.App.2d 619, 626 [213 P.2d 740] [tenant is not entitled, upon breach of a lease, to the return of a deposit made to secure performance of the lease; “the lessor may look to the fund...

section 6

250 LLC v. Photopoint Corp.(usa), 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 296 (2005) California state

Accordingly we conclude that the words “defaults in the payment of rent” in section 1950.7 refer only to unpaid rent that has accrued as of the time the security deposit is required to be returned, and do not refer...

People Ex Rel. Smith v. Parkmerced Co., 198 Cal. App. 3d 683 (1988)

People Ex Rel. Smith v. Parkmerced Co., 198 Cal. App. 3d 683 (1988) California state

...restore, replace or return personal property or appurtenances, exclusive of ordinary wear and tear, if the security deposit is authorized to be applied thereto by the rental agreement. [¶] (c) A landlord may not demand or receive security, however denominated, in...

Small Property Owners v. City & County of San Francisco, 47 Cal. Rptr. 3d 121 (2006)

Small Property Owners v. City & County of San Francisco, 47 Cal. Rptr. 3d 121 (2006) California state

...Here, by contrast, nearly two decades passed under the Ordinance before the landlords’ return on security deposits, even in money market accounts, was less than the 5 percent fixed rate. It is reasonable for landlords to foresee that some time...

People Ex Rel. Smith v. Parkmerced Co., 198 Cal. App. 3d 683 (1988)

People Ex Rel. Smith v. Parkmerced Co., 198 Cal. App. 3d 683 (1988) California state

...restore, replace or return personal property or appurtenances, exclusive of ordinary wear and tear, if the security deposit is authorized to be applied thereto by the rental agreement. [¶] (c) A landlord may not demand or receive security, however denominated, in...

Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)

Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980) California state

Civil Code section 1950.7 provides for the return by the lessor to the lessee of “[a]ny payment or deposit of money the primary function of which is to secure the performance of a rental agreement for other than...