Young v. Patukonis, 24 Mass. App. Ct. 907 (1987)
- Citation
- Young v. Patukonis, 24 Mass. App. Ct. 907 (1987)
- Parent Document
- Young v. Patukonis, 24 Mass. App. Ct. 907 (1987)
- Jurisdiction
- Massachusetts (state)
- Effective Date
- 1987-05-01
Other Sections in This Document (19)
- Young v. Patukonis, 24 Mass. App. Ct. 907 (1987)
- Young v. Patukonis, 24 Mass. App. Ct. 907 (1987)
- Young v. Patukonis, 24 Mass. App. Ct. 907 (1987)
- Young v. Patukonis, 24 Mass. App. Ct. 907 (1987)
- Young v. Patukonis, 24 Mass. App. Ct. 907 (1987)
- Young v. Patukonis, 24 Mass. App. Ct. 907 (1987)
- Young v. Patukonis, 24 Mass. App. Ct. 907 (1987)
- Young v. Patukonis, 24 Mass. App. Ct. 907 (1987)
- Young v. Patukonis, 24 Mass. App. Ct. 907 (1987)
- Young v. Patukonis, 24 Mass. App. Ct. 907 (1987)
- Young v. Patukonis, 24 Mass. App. Ct. 907 (1987)
- Young v. Patukonis, 24 Mass. App. Ct. 907 (1987)
- Young v. Patukonis, 24 Mass. App. Ct. 907 (1987)
- Young v. Patukonis, 24 Mass. App. Ct. 907 (1987)
- Young v. Patukonis, 24 Mass. App. Ct. 907 (1987)
- Young v. Patukonis, 24 Mass. App. Ct. 907 (1987)
- Young v. Patukonis, 24 Mass. App. Ct. 907 (1987)
- Young v. Patukonis, 24 Mass. App. Ct. 907 (1987)
- Young v. Patukonis, 24 Mass. App. Ct. 907 (1987)
Full Text
543 charsIn finding that Young violated the requirements of the security deposit statute, the judge limited the tenant’s damage award to interest of $5.21. He refused to grant treble damages under § 15B (7) of the statute because the tenant was still in possession and the deposit had been returned. Patukonis argues that she is entitled to treble damages, interest and attorney’s fees for the breach of § 15B (3) (a), & 6 (a). The question has been answered in Patukonis’s favor by the recent case of Castenholz v. Caira, 21 Mass. App. Ct. 758 (1986).