Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Korens v. R. W. Zukin Corp., 212 Cal. App. 3d 1054 (1989)

Citation
Korens v. R. W. Zukin Corp., 212 Cal. App. 3d 1054 (1989)
Parent Document
Korens v. R. W. Zukin Corp., 212 Cal. App. 3d 1054 (1989)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
1989-08-02

Other Sections in This Document (52)

Full Text

584 chars
We note in passing Korens stated in her declaration opposing summary judgment that, quite apart from the matter of interest on the security deposit, the security deposit itself had not been returned to her. However, each cause of action of Korens’s complaint charged only that Zukin’s retention of the “interest earned” on the security deposit was wrongful. Since Zukin was entitled to retain the security deposit under certain circumstances at the conclusion of Korens’s tenancy, and since Korens did not charge in her complaint that retention of the deposit was wrongful, 2 no *1063