Frazier v. Super. Ct. (2022)
- Citation
- Frazier v. Super. Ct. (2022)
- Parent Document
- Frazier v. Super. Ct. (2022)
- Jurisdiction
- California (state)
- Effective Date
- 2022-12-16
Other Sections in This Document (22)
- Frazier v. Super. Ct. (2022)
- Frazier v. Super. Ct. (2022)
- Frazier v. Super. Ct. (2022)
- Frazier v. Super. Ct. (2022)
- Frazier v. Super. Ct. (2022)
- Frazier v. Super. Ct. (2022)
- Frazier v. Super. Ct. (2022)
- Frazier v. Super. Ct. (2022)
- Frazier v. Super. Ct. (2022)
- Frazier v. Super. Ct. (2022)
- Frazier v. Super. Ct. (2022)
- Frazier v. Super. Ct. (2022)
- Frazier v. Super. Ct. (2022)
- Frazier v. Super. Ct. (2022)
- Frazier v. Super. Ct. (2022)
- Frazier v. Super. Ct. (2022)
- Frazier v. Super. Ct. (2022)
- Frazier v. Super. Ct. (2022)
- Frazier v. Super. Ct. (2022)
- Frazier v. Super. Ct. (2022)
- Frazier v. Super. Ct. (2022)
- Frazier v. Super. Ct. (2022)
Full Text
640 charsPlaintiffs do not challenge defendants’ claim the Ordinance is not preempted by state law. We resolve the issue of preemption in favor of upholding the Ordinance. (See Rental Housing Assn., supra, 171 Cal.App.4th at pp. 755-757 [notice requirement properly regulated the substantive grounds for eviction without imposing an inherent delay]; cf. Birkenfeld, supra, 17 Cal.3d at pp. 150-151 [ordinance requiring certificate of eviction from city before landlord commences unlawful detainer action was invalid to the extent it imposed a procedural barrier between the landlord and the summary proceeding which is fully occupied by state law].)