360 So Reeves, LLC v. Dutton (2026)

Citation: 360 So Reeves, LLC v. Dutton (2026)
Parent Document: 360 So Reeves, LLC v. Dutton (2026)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 2026-03-20
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10812451/360-so-reeves-llc-v-dutton/ ↗

Full Text

613 chars

5
         Defendant filed timely motions seeking a new trial and to set aside and/or vacate the
judgment. The court denied both motions. Defendant’s timely notice of appeal identifies both
the judgment and the denial of his post-judgment motions as the subjects of the appeal. The
denial of defendant’s motion for new trial is not appealable. (Walker v. Los Angeles County
Metropolitan Transportation Authority (2005) 35 Cal.4th 15, 18-19.) We follow defendant’s
approach in his briefing and only assess only the validity of the judgment, not the order denying
his motion to vacate and/or set aside the judgment.

Other Sections in This Document (22)

Full Text