South Brooklyn Ry. Co. v. Heung Man Lau, 2024 NY Slip Op 24139 (2024)

Citation: South Brooklyn Ry. Co. v. Heung Man Lau, 2024 NY Slip Op 24139 (2024)
Parent Document: South Brooklyn Ry. Co. v. Heung Man Lau, 2024 NY Slip Op 24139 (2024)
Jurisdiction: New York (state)
Effective Date: 2024-05-07
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/9500911/south-brooklyn-ry-co-v-heung-man-lau/ ↗

Full Text

621 chars

Each of these affirmative defenses assume that Petitioner has a legal duty to justify its refusal to renew the license or its decision to terminate the license. No such duty exists (see Summary Judgment Denied supra at 3-4; see also Matter of Arc on 4th St. Inc. v Quesada, 112 AD3d 431, 432 [1st Dept 2013] ["[A notice to terminate] does not require a landlord to state the precise grounds for eviction."]). Respondent did not cite to any authority to the contrary and the Court is unaware of any such authority. Therefore, Petitioner's motivation for terminating the license is not properly before the Court for review.

Other Sections in This Document (70)

Full Text