St. James Court, L. L. C. v. Booker, 176 Misc. 2d 693 (1998)
- Citation
- St. James Court, L. L. C. v. Booker, 176 Misc. 2d 693 (1998)
- Parent Document
- St. James Court, L. L. C. v. Booker, 176 Misc. 2d 693 (1998)
- Jurisdiction
- New York (state)
- Effective Date
- 1998-02-24
Other Sections in This Document (10)
- St. James Court, L. L. C. v. Booker, 176 Misc. 2d 693 (1998)
- St. James Court, L. L. C. v. Booker, 176 Misc. 2d 693 (1998)
- St. James Court, L. L. C. v. Booker, 176 Misc. 2d 693 (1998)
- St. James Court, L. L. C. v. Booker, 176 Misc. 2d 693 (1998)
- St. James Court, L. L. C. v. Booker, 176 Misc. 2d 693 (1998)
- St. James Court, L. L. C. v. Booker, 176 Misc. 2d 693 (1998)
- St. James Court, L. L. C. v. Booker, 176 Misc. 2d 693 (1998)
- St. James Court, L. L. C. v. Booker, 176 Misc. 2d 693 (1998)
- St. James Court, L. L. C. v. Booker, 176 Misc. 2d 693 (1998)
- St. James Court, L. L. C. v. Booker, 176 Misc. 2d 693 (1998)
Full Text
496 charsProof of a demand for rent is a jurisdictional requisite to maintain a summary proceeding (Solack Estates v Goodman, 102 Misc 2d 504 [App Term, 1st Dept 1979], affd 78 AD2d 512 [1st Dept 1980]), and failing to comply calls for dismissal of the action. Defects in the predicate notice are not subject to cure by amendment and require dismissal of the proceeding. (Chinatown Apts. v Chu Cho Lam, 51 NY2d 786 [1980].) Respondent’s motion is granted and the proceeding is dismissed without prejudice.