601 West 160 Realty Corp. v. Henry, 183 Misc. 2d 666 (2000)
- Citation
- 601 West 160 Realty Corp. v. Henry, 183 Misc. 2d 666 (2000)
- Parent Document
- 601 West 160 Realty Corp. v. Henry, 183 Misc. 2d 666 (2000)
- Jurisdiction
- New York (state)
- Effective Date
- 2000-02-09
Other Sections in This Document (21)
- 601 West 160 Realty Corp. v. Henry, 183 Misc. 2d 666 (2000)
- 601 West 160 Realty Corp. v. Henry, 183 Misc. 2d 666 (2000)
- 601 West 160 Realty Corp. v. Henry, 183 Misc. 2d 666 (2000)
- 601 West 160 Realty Corp. v. Henry, 183 Misc. 2d 666 (2000)
- 601 West 160 Realty Corp. v. Henry, 183 Misc. 2d 666 (2000)
- 601 West 160 Realty Corp. v. Henry, 183 Misc. 2d 666 (2000)
- 601 West 160 Realty Corp. v. Henry, 183 Misc. 2d 666 (2000)
- 601 West 160 Realty Corp. v. Henry, 183 Misc. 2d 666 (2000)
- 601 West 160 Realty Corp. v. Henry, 183 Misc. 2d 666 (2000)
- 601 West 160 Realty Corp. v. Henry, 183 Misc. 2d 666 (2000)
- 601 West 160 Realty Corp. v. Henry, 183 Misc. 2d 666 (2000)
- 601 West 160 Realty Corp. v. Henry, 183 Misc. 2d 666 (2000)
- 601 West 160 Realty Corp. v. Henry, 183 Misc. 2d 666 (2000)
- 601 West 160 Realty Corp. v. Henry, 183 Misc. 2d 666 (2000)
- 601 West 160 Realty Corp. v. Henry, 183 Misc. 2d 666 (2000)
- 601 West 160 Realty Corp. v. Henry, 183 Misc. 2d 666 (2000)
- 601 West 160 Realty Corp. v. Henry, 183 Misc. 2d 666 (2000)
- 601 West 160 Realty Corp. v. Henry, 183 Misc. 2d 666 (2000)
- 601 West 160 Realty Corp. v. Henry, 183 Misc. 2d 666 (2000)
- 601 West 160 Realty Corp. v. Henry, 183 Misc. 2d 666 (2000)
- 601 West 160 Realty Corp. v. Henry, 183 Misc. 2d 666 (2000)
Full Text
793 charsThe gravamen of the pertinent counterclaims are breach of warranty of habitability and retaliatory eviction based on respondent’s claim that (1) no rent is or has ever been owed, (2) there exists a continuing pattern of summary nonpayment proceedings, and (3) respondent is president of the tenants’ association. Specifically, in respondent’s “Fifth Counterclaim and Set-Off,” he alleges in his verified answer that on two occasions after receiving the underlying five-day rent demand, he presented canceled checks for the rent demanded, and petitioner commenced the nonpayment proceedings. Respondent further alleged defenses of lack of personal jurisdiction based on respondent’s specific factual allegations supporting his claim for defective service of the petition and notice of petition.