225 East 64th Street, LLC v. Prystowsky, 96 A.D.3d 536 (2012)
- Citation
- 225 East 64th Street, LLC v. Prystowsky, 96 A.D.3d 536 (2012)
- Parent Document
- 225 East 64th Street, LLC v. Prystowsky, 96 A.D.3d 536 (2012)
- Jurisdiction
- New York (state)
- Effective Date
- 2012-06-14
Other Sections in This Document (10)
- 225 East 64th Street, LLC v. Prystowsky, 96 A.D.3d 536 (2012)
- 225 East 64th Street, LLC v. Prystowsky, 96 A.D.3d 536 (2012)
- 225 East 64th Street, LLC v. Prystowsky, 96 A.D.3d 536 (2012)
- 225 East 64th Street, LLC v. Prystowsky, 96 A.D.3d 536 (2012)
- 225 East 64th Street, LLC v. Prystowsky, 96 A.D.3d 536 (2012)
- 225 East 64th Street, LLC v. Prystowsky, 96 A.D.3d 536 (2012)
- 225 East 64th Street, LLC v. Prystowsky, 96 A.D.3d 536 (2012)
- 225 East 64th Street, LLC v. Prystowsky, 96 A.D.3d 536 (2012)
- 225 East 64th Street, LLC v. Prystowsky, 96 A.D.3d 536 (2012)
- 225 East 64th Street, LLC v. Prystowsky, 96 A.D.3d 536 (2012)
Full Text
299 charsDefendant’s claim of constructive eviction after the roof repair had been completed, however, is defeated by the undisputed facts that defendant retook possession of the demised premises, which had been fully restored, and remained therein for eight months (see Pacific Coast Silks, 76 AD3d at 172).