Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Citation
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Parent Document
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Jurisdiction
- United States (federal)
- Effective Date
- 1984-01-30
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/431015/troy-ltd-v-renna/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (109)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
- Troy Ltd. v. Renna, 727 F.2d 287 (1984)
Full Text
1,955 chars39 We have no doubt that the 1981 Tenancy Act passes muster under the contract clause as interpreted in Energy Reserves Group. First, it is doubtful that any impairment of a contractual relationship has occurred. The Tenancy Act only enlarged, for senior citizens and the disabled, a preexisting statutory tenancy which came into operation as a matter of law. Prior to the enactment of the Tenancy Act, New Jersey had already placed significant limitations upon the rights of owners of multiple dwellings to define the landlord-tenant relationship solely in terms of contract. The 1974 Anti-Eviction Act, which is not here challenged, provided that tenants could not be evicted, except for designated causes not relevant here, during the contractual term of a lease. See note 1 supra. Moreover, the Act mandated an eight-year extension of the lease--or a four-year extension coupled with a "hardship compensation payment"--if the landlord did not offer the tenant comparable housing. N.J.Stat.Ann. Sec. 2A:18-61.2(g) (West Supp.1983). Thus, beginning in 1974 the terms of the landlord-tenant relationship were specified to a large extent by statute. The Tenancy Act only operates to protect those statutory tenants whose relationship with their landlord has already become non-consensual by virtue of the Anti-Eviction Act. That is, the Tenancy Act simply enlarges the terms of a statutory tenancy already created by the Anti-Eviction Act. All of the plaintiffs acquired their interests in the Springfield complex after the Anti-Eviction Act went into effect. Such an enlargement of an already-regulated statutory tenancy is probably not an impairment at all. As the Supreme Court held in Veix v. Sixth Ward Building & Loan Ass'n, 310 U.S. 32, 38, 60 S.Ct. 792, 794, 84 L.Ed. 1061 (1940), "[w]hen he purchased into an enterprise already regulated in the particular to which he now objects, he purchased subject to further legislation upon the same topic."