Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Department of Housing and Urban Development v. Rucker, 535 U.S. 125 (2002)

Citation
Department of Housing and Urban Development v. Rucker, 535 U.S. 125 (2002)
Parent Document
Department of Housing and Urban Development v. Rucker, 535 U.S. 125 (2002)
Effective Date
2002-03-26

Other Sections in This Document (59)

Full Text

370 chars
The en banc Court of Appeals cited only the due process constitutional concern. Respondents raise two others: the First Amendment and the Excessive Fines Clause. We agree with Judge O’Scannlain, writing for the panel that reversed the injunction, that the statute does not raise substantial First Amendment or Excessive Fines Clause concerns. Lyng v. Automobile Workers,