Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)

Citation: Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Parent Document: Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Jurisdiction: Missouri (state)
Effective Date: 1996-05-28
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1758627/mark-vii-inc-v-barthol/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (39)

Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)
Mark VII, Inc. v. Barthol, 926 S.W.2d 128 (1996)

Full Text

358 chars

The basis for granting respondent’s motion to dismiss appellants’ claim for civil conspiracy was two — fold: (1) appellants’ failure to allege that respondent interfered with a lien; and, (2) appellants’ failure to plead with sufficient specificity the necessary elements to state a cause of action for civil conspiracy. We will look first at the lien issue.