Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Hamilton Music, Inc. v. Gordon A. Gundaker Real Estate Co., 666 S.W.2d 840 (1984)

Citation
Hamilton Music, Inc. v. Gordon A. Gundaker Real Estate Co., 666 S.W.2d 840 (1984)
Parent Document
Hamilton Music, Inc. v. Gordon A. Gundaker Real Estate Co., 666 S.W.2d 840 (1984)
Jurisdiction
Missouri (state)
Effective Date
1984-01-24

Other Sections in This Document (40)

Full Text

443 chars
conditioned upon Wee Too’s ownership or successful financing, the language of the document should have reflected that intention. Expressions including “subject to financing” or “subject to ownership” are examples of proper professional draftsmanship. If, as appellants argue, the document executed was not a lease, but, instead, an agreement to lease, the parties should have been denominated “prospective lessor” and “prospective lessee.” See