Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Lee v. Bass, 215 S.W.3d 283 (2007)

Citation
Lee v. Bass, 215 S.W.3d 283 (2007)
Parent Document
Lee v. Bass, 215 S.W.3d 283 (2007)
Jurisdiction
Missouri (state)
Effective Date
2007-02-20

Other Sections in This Document (73)

Full Text

609 chars
Included in the testimony of the Basses was the uncontradicted statement that the first signed agreement was abandoned and the lease-option agreement was executed second, in place of the other contract. Such testimony was admissible and relevant because it established the order of the two contracts signed the same day. Thus, the trial court did not err in concluding that the first agreement was not operative and that the operative agreement was the lease-option contract. We believe, however, for reasons discussed more fully below, that the court erred in its interpretation of the lease-option contract.