Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Citation
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Parent Document
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 1989-09-12
Other Sections in This Document (25)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
Full Text
382 charsCount II alleged similar facts but based upon a theory of violations of the Merchandising Practices Act, ch. 407, RSMo., 1986. Count III was based upon a theory of wrongful failure to return a security deposit pursuant to § 535.300, R.S.Mo., 1986. Count IV alleged a breach of contract theory for failing to return the deposit, and Count V alleged a theory of prima facie *2 tort. 1