Vermett v. State, 544 S.W.3d 294 (2018)

Citation: Vermett v. State, 544 S.W.3d 294 (2018)
Parent Document: Vermett v. State, 544 S.W.3d 294 (2018)
Jurisdiction: Missouri (state)
Effective Date: 2018-02-27
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/6241359/vermett-v-state/ ↗

Full Text

997 chars

In a letter addressed to Villa Roma's management office sent February 18, 2010, Mrs. Henderson formally requested to have a ramp to Building 1915 installed at Respondents' expense. This letter was returned to Respondents as "refused." Mrs. Henderson sent a second similar letter to Villa Roma's Post Office Box address in St. Charles on March 2, 2010; Respondents did not receive a response to this letter. Subsequently, Villa Roma suggested that Respondents could use the ground-level sliding glass door as a means of entrance into Unit 1915C instead of the primary entrance, which would thereby negate the need to build a ramp.2 However, the entryway through the sliding glass door was too narrow for Mrs. Henderson's wheelchair and it was not possible to lock the sliding glass door from the outside (meaning that the apartment would remain unlocked if Mrs. Henderson chose to leave the apartment when Mr. Henderson was not there). Unit 1915C was rented to another individual on April 23, 2010.

Other Sections in This Document (39)

Full Text