PDQ Tower Services, Inc. v. Adams, 213 S.W.3d 697 (2007)
- Citation
- PDQ Tower Services, Inc. v. Adams, 213 S.W.3d 697 (2007)
- Parent Document
- PDQ Tower Services, Inc. v. Adams, 213 S.W.3d 697 (2007)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 2007-01-23
Other Sections in This Document (29)
- PDQ Tower Services, Inc. v. Adams, 213 S.W.3d 697 (2007)
- PDQ Tower Services, Inc. v. Adams, 213 S.W.3d 697 (2007)
- PDQ Tower Services, Inc. v. Adams, 213 S.W.3d 697 (2007)
- PDQ Tower Services, Inc. v. Adams, 213 S.W.3d 697 (2007)
- PDQ Tower Services, Inc. v. Adams, 213 S.W.3d 697 (2007)
- PDQ Tower Services, Inc. v. Adams, 213 S.W.3d 697 (2007)
- PDQ Tower Services, Inc. v. Adams, 213 S.W.3d 697 (2007)
- PDQ Tower Services, Inc. v. Adams, 213 S.W.3d 697 (2007)
- PDQ Tower Services, Inc. v. Adams, 213 S.W.3d 697 (2007)
- PDQ Tower Services, Inc. v. Adams, 213 S.W.3d 697 (2007)
- PDQ Tower Services, Inc. v. Adams, 213 S.W.3d 697 (2007)
- PDQ Tower Services, Inc. v. Adams, 213 S.W.3d 697 (2007)
- PDQ Tower Services, Inc. v. Adams, 213 S.W.3d 697 (2007)
- PDQ Tower Services, Inc. v. Adams, 213 S.W.3d 697 (2007)
- PDQ Tower Services, Inc. v. Adams, 213 S.W.3d 697 (2007)
- PDQ Tower Services, Inc. v. Adams, 213 S.W.3d 697 (2007)
- PDQ Tower Services, Inc. v. Adams, 213 S.W.3d 697 (2007)
- PDQ Tower Services, Inc. v. Adams, 213 S.W.3d 697 (2007)
- PDQ Tower Services, Inc. v. Adams, 213 S.W.3d 697 (2007)
- PDQ Tower Services, Inc. v. Adams, 213 S.W.3d 697 (2007)
- PDQ Tower Services, Inc. v. Adams, 213 S.W.3d 697 (2007)
- PDQ Tower Services, Inc. v. Adams, 213 S.W.3d 697 (2007)
- PDQ Tower Services, Inc. v. Adams, 213 S.W.3d 697 (2007)
- PDQ Tower Services, Inc. v. Adams, 213 S.W.3d 697 (2007)
- PDQ Tower Services, Inc. v. Adams, 213 S.W.3d 697 (2007)
- PDQ Tower Services, Inc. v. Adams, 213 S.W.3d 697 (2007)
- PDQ Tower Services, Inc. v. Adams, 213 S.W.3d 697 (2007)
- PDQ Tower Services, Inc. v. Adams, 213 S.W.3d 697 (2007)
- PDQ Tower Services, Inc. v. Adams, 213 S.W.3d 697 (2007)
Full Text
571 charsIn their sole point, the Adamses claim that the circuit court erroneously applied the law when it awarded twice the security deposit amount to PDQ under section 535.300.5 because the section only applies to residential tenants, and PDQ was a commercial tenant. PDQ contends that the section applies to it because the section does not specify which type of tenant may recover damages from the landlord’s wrongful withholding. The issue is whether section 535.300.5 applies to tenants of a non-dwelling unit. This court determined in Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. King