Chiodini v. Fox, 207 S.W.3d 174 (2006)
- Citation
- Chiodini v. Fox, 207 S.W.3d 174 (2006)
- Parent Document
- Chiodini v. Fox, 207 S.W.3d 174 (2006)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 2006-10-03
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2273811/chiodini-v-fox/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (32)
- Chiodini v. Fox, 207 S.W.3d 174 (2006)
- Chiodini v. Fox, 207 S.W.3d 174 (2006)
- Chiodini v. Fox, 207 S.W.3d 174 (2006)
- Chiodini v. Fox, 207 S.W.3d 174 (2006)
- Chiodini v. Fox, 207 S.W.3d 174 (2006)
- Chiodini v. Fox, 207 S.W.3d 174 (2006)
- Chiodini v. Fox, 207 S.W.3d 174 (2006)
- Chiodini v. Fox, 207 S.W.3d 174 (2006)
- Chiodini v. Fox, 207 S.W.3d 174 (2006)
- Chiodini v. Fox, 207 S.W.3d 174 (2006)
- Chiodini v. Fox, 207 S.W.3d 174 (2006)
- Chiodini v. Fox, 207 S.W.3d 174 (2006)
- Chiodini v. Fox, 207 S.W.3d 174 (2006)
- Chiodini v. Fox, 207 S.W.3d 174 (2006)
- Chiodini v. Fox, 207 S.W.3d 174 (2006)
- Chiodini v. Fox, 207 S.W.3d 174 (2006)
- Chiodini v. Fox, 207 S.W.3d 174 (2006)
- Chiodini v. Fox, 207 S.W.3d 174 (2006)
- Chiodini v. Fox, 207 S.W.3d 174 (2006)
- Chiodini v. Fox, 207 S.W.3d 174 (2006)
- Chiodini v. Fox, 207 S.W.3d 174 (2006)
- Chiodini v. Fox, 207 S.W.3d 174 (2006)
- Chiodini v. Fox, 207 S.W.3d 174 (2006)
- Chiodini v. Fox, 207 S.W.3d 174 (2006)
- Chiodini v. Fox, 207 S.W.3d 174 (2006)
- Chiodini v. Fox, 207 S.W.3d 174 (2006)
- Chiodini v. Fox, 207 S.W.3d 174 (2006)
- Chiodini v. Fox, 207 S.W.3d 174 (2006)
- Chiodini v. Fox, 207 S.W.3d 174 (2006)
- Chiodini v. Fox, 207 S.W.3d 174 (2006)
- Chiodini v. Fox, 207 S.W.3d 174 (2006)
- Chiodini v. Fox, 207 S.W.3d 174 (2006)
Full Text
574 charsSecond, there must be dangerous or unsanitary conditions materially affecting the life, health, or safety of Fox-Winkler. The exposed electrical wires clearly posed a risk to Fox-Winkler and their children. Additionally, the fire-blocking issue posed a risk, inasmuch as the billiard room did not have the required protection if a fire were to start. Thus, the exposed electrical wires and fire-blocking issue constituted dangerous conditions materially affecting the safety of Fox-Winkler. Accordingly, these code violations were not merely de minimis as Chiodini contends.