Sklar v. Hightower, 342 A.2d 57 (1975)
- Citation
- Sklar v. Hightower, 342 A.2d 57 (1975)
- Parent Document
- Sklar v. Hightower, 342 A.2d 57 (1975)
- Jurisdiction
- DC (municipal)
- Effective Date
- 1975-07-16
Other Sections in This Document (16)
- Sklar v. Hightower, 342 A.2d 57 (1975)
- Sklar v. Hightower, 342 A.2d 57 (1975)
- Sklar v. Hightower, 342 A.2d 57 (1975)
- Sklar v. Hightower, 342 A.2d 57 (1975)
- Sklar v. Hightower, 342 A.2d 57 (1975)
- Sklar v. Hightower, 342 A.2d 57 (1975)
- Sklar v. Hightower, 342 A.2d 57 (1975)
- Sklar v. Hightower, 342 A.2d 57 (1975)
- Sklar v. Hightower, 342 A.2d 57 (1975)
- Sklar v. Hightower, 342 A.2d 57 (1975)
- Sklar v. Hightower, 342 A.2d 57 (1975)
- Sklar v. Hightower, 342 A.2d 57 (1975)
- Sklar v. Hightower, 342 A.2d 57 (1975)
- Sklar v. Hightower, 342 A.2d 57 (1975)
- Sklar v. Hightower, 342 A.2d 57 (1975)
- Sklar v. Hightower, 342 A.2d 57 (1975)
Full Text
474 charsIn early or mid-August of 1974, the tenant was informed that she would have to vacate her apartment by September 1 unless she would agree to a rent increase. On about August 22, the tenant orally notified the landlords that she would not agree to the increase and would vacate by September. She moved out on August 30. For reasons which are unlcear, the tenant’s attempts to return the keys to the apartment were ineffective, and the landlords spent $30 to change the locks.