Hart v. Vermont Investment Ltd. Partnership, 667 A.2d 578 (1995)

Citation: Hart v. Vermont Investment Ltd. Partnership, 667 A.2d 578 (1995)
Parent Document: Hart v. Vermont Investment Ltd. Partnership, 667 A.2d 578 (1995)
Jurisdiction: DC (municipal)
Effective Date: 1995-11-09
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2383641/hart-v-vermont-investment-ltd-p... ↗

Full Text

782 chars

The case was tried to the court, sitting without a jury, on October 28, 1992. On March 10, 1994, the trial judge issued his written Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order. After setting out the facts in some detail, the judge concluded that there had been no meeting of the minds on material terms in the lease, and that the lease was therefore unenforceable. He reached this conclusion because, in his view, “[t]he square footage provision regarding office space is materially at variance with the understanding of the parties.” Recognizing that Section 2.01 of the lease “provides for adjustments to the lease agreement in the event of a discrepancy,” the judge was of the opinion that this provision “contemplates *582 only de minimis adjustments.” The judge stated that

Other Sections in This Document (107)

Full Text