Pourbabai v. Bednarek (2021)

Citation: Pourbabai v. Bednarek (2021)
Parent Document: Pourbabai v. Bednarek (2021)
Jurisdiction: DC (municipal)
Effective Date: 2021-05-13
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4882758/pourbabai-v-bednarek/ ↗

Full Text

977 chars

6
         Mr. Pourbabai also blasts his own attorneys for “abandonment,” accuses
them of “aid[ing] and abet[ting]” the tenants, and insinuates that they accepted
bribes. He accuses the tenants of fraud, perjury, and conspiracy, and the trial court
of “bias.” And he attempts to lodge objections to an inapposite bankruptcy matter
not before this court. We decline to consider these arguments. None have
evidentiary support, and all are perfunctory and undeveloped. See Musa v.
Continental Ins. Co., 644 A.2d 999, 1002 (D.C. 1994) (“Mere conclusory allegations
on the part of the non-moving party are insufficient to stave off the entry of summary
judgment.”); Comford v. United States, 947 A.2d 1181, 1188 (D.C. 2008) (“It is not
enough merely to mention a possible argument in the most skeletal way, leaving the
court to do counsel’s work, create the ossature for the argument, and put flesh on its
bones.”) (quotations omitted).
                                          11

Other Sections in This Document (194)

Full Text