Caitlin Cromar, Et Ano, V. Tag Realty, Llc. (2026)

Citation: Caitlin Cromar, Et Ano, V. Tag Realty, Llc. (2026)
Parent Document: Caitlin Cromar, Et Ano, V. Tag Realty, Llc. (2026)
Jurisdiction: Washington (state)
Effective Date: 2026-01-12
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10773374/caitlin-cromar-et-ano-v-tag-re... ↗

Full Text

732 chars

17
          We emphasize that, as we observed in View Ridge Estates Homeowners Ass’n v.
Guetter,
       “[t]he essential goal in shifting fees (to either party) is to do rough justice, not to
       achieve auditing perfection.” Fox v. Vice, 563 U.S. 826, 838, 131 S. Ct. 2205,
       180 L. Ed. 2d 45 (2011). Indeed, “the determination of fees ‘should not result in a
       second major litigation.’” [Id.] at 838 (quoting Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424,
       437, 103 S. Ct. 1933, 76 L. Ed. 2d 40 (1983)). We encourage the trial court and
       the parties to keep as much in mind on remand.
30 Wn. App. 2d 612, 648-49, 546 P.3d 463, review denied, 554 P.3d 1225 (2024).
                                                27

Other Sections in This Document (502)

Full Text