Kennedy v. McGuire, 38 Wash. App. 237 (1984)
- Citation
- Kennedy v. McGuire, 38 Wash. App. 237 (1984)
- Parent Document
- Kennedy v. McGuire, 38 Wash. App. 237 (1984)
- Jurisdiction
- Washington (state)
- Effective Date
- 1984-07-23
Other Sections in This Document (27)
- Kennedy v. McGuire, 38 Wash. App. 237 (1984)
- Kennedy v. McGuire, 38 Wash. App. 237 (1984)
- Kennedy v. McGuire, 38 Wash. App. 237 (1984)
- Kennedy v. McGuire, 38 Wash. App. 237 (1984)
- Kennedy v. McGuire, 38 Wash. App. 237 (1984)
- Kennedy v. McGuire, 38 Wash. App. 237 (1984)
- Kennedy v. McGuire, 38 Wash. App. 237 (1984)
- Kennedy v. McGuire, 38 Wash. App. 237 (1984)
- Kennedy v. McGuire, 38 Wash. App. 237 (1984)
- Kennedy v. McGuire, 38 Wash. App. 237 (1984)
- Kennedy v. McGuire, 38 Wash. App. 237 (1984)
- Kennedy v. McGuire, 38 Wash. App. 237 (1984)
- Kennedy v. McGuire, 38 Wash. App. 237 (1984)
- Kennedy v. McGuire, 38 Wash. App. 237 (1984)
- Kennedy v. McGuire, 38 Wash. App. 237 (1984)
- Kennedy v. McGuire, 38 Wash. App. 237 (1984)
- Kennedy v. McGuire, 38 Wash. App. 237 (1984)
- Kennedy v. McGuire, 38 Wash. App. 237 (1984)
- Kennedy v. McGuire, 38 Wash. App. 237 (1984)
- Kennedy v. McGuire, 38 Wash. App. 237 (1984)
- Kennedy v. McGuire, 38 Wash. App. 237 (1984)
- Kennedy v. McGuire, 38 Wash. App. 237 (1984)
- Kennedy v. McGuire, 38 Wash. App. 237 (1984)
- Kennedy v. McGuire, 38 Wash. App. 237 (1984)
- Kennedy v. McGuire, 38 Wash. App. 237 (1984)
- Kennedy v. McGuire, 38 Wash. App. 237 (1984)
- Kennedy v. McGuire, 38 Wash. App. 237 (1984)
Full Text
767 charsThe trial court also ruled that the action was erroneously brought under the section of the unlawful detainer statute which requires only a 3-day eviction notice. RCW 59.12-.030(6). It was argued below that the action should have been brought under RCW 59.12.030(2), which requires a 20-day notice of eviction. However, regardless of which section of the unlawful detainer statute the Kennedys invoked, Allan would have had the right to raise as an affirmative defense the 4-month notice requirement of the *244floating homes ordinance. See Kennedy, at 384. Because we have found compliance with the ordinance's notice requirement, we need not reach the question of which section of the unlawful detainer statute was applicable in this case. The judgment is reversed.