§ 3604

Citation: § 3604
Parent Document: Kiemle & Hagood Company v. Mariam P. Daniels a/k/a Phoebe Daniels (2023)
Jurisdiction: Washington (state)
Effective Date: 2023-04-27
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/9440172/kiemle-hagood-company-v-mariam-... ↗

Full Text

785 chars

7
                The Joint Statement is a policy statement, rather than an authoritative
       interpretation, but it has been recognized as persuasive authority. See, e.g., Bhogaita v.
       Altamonte Heights Condo. Ass’n, Inc., 765 F.3d 1277, 1286 n.3 (11th Cir. 2014); Sabal
       Palm Condos. of Pine Island Ridge Ass’n, Inc. v. Fischer, 6 F. Supp. 3d 1272, 1286 (S.D.
       Fla. 2014); Douglas v. Kriegsfeld Corp., 884 A.2d 1109, 1120, 1122 (D.C. Cir. 2005);
       Andover Hous. Auth. v. Shkolnik, 443 Mass. 300, 309 n.14, 820 N.E.2d 815 (2005); Kuhn
       v. McNary Estates Homeowners Ass’n., Inc., 228 F. Supp. 3d 1142, 1149 (D. Or. 2017).
       K&H does not disagree that the Joint Statement should be referenced as persuasive
       authority. See Br. of Resp’t at 45.

Other Sections in This Document (519)

Full Text