Sherwood Auburn Llc, V. Joel Pinzon, Et Ano. (2022)

Citation: Sherwood Auburn Llc, V. Joel Pinzon, Et Ano. (2022)
Parent Document: Sherwood Auburn Llc, V. Joel Pinzon, Et Ano. (2022)
Jurisdiction: Washington (state)
Effective Date: 2022-12-05
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10798089/sherwood-auburn-llc-v-joel-pin... ↗

Full Text

1,172 chars

4
                     The full text of this provision states:
                   The lessor of a covered dwelling unit—
                       (1) may not require the tenant to vacate the covered dwelling unit before the
                       date that is 30 days after the date on which the lessor provides the tenant
                       with a notice to vacate; and
                       (2) may not issue a notice to vacate under paragraph (1) until after
                       expiration of the period described in subsection (b) [the 120-day eviction
                       moratorium].
          15 U.S.C. § 9058(c).
                   5
                     Sherwood Auburn clarified its interpretation of the CARES Act notice provision at oral
          argument. According to Sherwood Auburn, the proper interpretation of the provision would
          replace the word “lessor” with the words “superior court.” Thus, Sherwood Auburn asserts that
          the statute should be understood as providing that the superior court—not the lessor—“may not
          require the tenant to vacate the covered dwelling unit before the date that is 30 days after the

Other Sections in This Document (322)

Full Text