Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Section Cmty

Citation
Section Cmty
Parent Document
Virginia Chiu & Vincent Liew, Appellants\cross-resps. V. Brian Hoskins, Respondent\cross-apps., 534 P.3d 412 (2023)
Jurisdiction
Washington (state)
Effective Date
2023-08-21

Other Sections in This Document (309)

Full Text

735 chars
187 Wn. App. 816, 351 P.3d 214 (2015). Contrary to Tenants’ argument, the court in Pham did not
allow the tenants to recover under both the RLTA and the SMC for the same underlying violation.
Instead, the issue was whether the tenants could recover both relocation assistance under SMC
22.206.260(F) and other relief under the RLTA. 187 Wn. App. at 835. Also critical here, Pham
interpreted and applied chapter 22.206 SMC and not the provisions in chapter 7.24 SMC at issue
here. 187 Wn. App. at 835. It is of no moment here that Title 22 SMC does not affect or limit a
tenant’s rights under the RLTA—as the court held in Pham, citing SMC 22.206.305—because
Tenants here are not pursuing a claim under that title. -9-
No. 83734-6-I/10