Scott Egbert v. Richard Jorgensen (2025)

Citation: Scott Egbert v. Richard Jorgensen (2025)
Parent Document: Scott Egbert v. Richard Jorgensen (2025)
Jurisdiction: Washington (state)
Effective Date: 2025-12-10
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10750781/scott-egbert-v-richard-jorgensen/ ↗

Full Text

1,001 chars

[W]e have a showing from the [Egberts]—and I would agree with the [Egberts’]
        counsel that the showing is probably not going to be any different than the Court
        would ever see at the time of trial. The [Egberts] are in control of the information
        that they would be presenting. They presented their case well as to, yes, I have all
        sorts of places, but these are the reasons why I want to live in this one place.
        And so even if it were in a presumptive world, I think that they have defeated the
        issue and presented evidence that supports his desire to live in the residence, and
        the 90-day notice would be appropriate.
        ....
        I believe that the [Egberts] ha[ve] provided the Court with sufficient information
        for the Court to make a decision today that the 90-day notice was appropriate, that
        the 90-day notice was effective, and that the Writ of Restitution is appropriate
        today. VRP (July 8, 2024) at 31-32.

Other Sections in This Document (909)

Full Text