Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Citation
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Parent Document
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Jurisdiction
- Washington (state)
- Effective Date
- 1994-09-29
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1451149/frobig-v-gordon/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (57)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- Frobig v. Gordon, 881 P.2d 226 (1994)
- § 14
- § 14
- § 14
- § 14
- § 14
- § 14
- § 14
- § 14
- § 14
- § 14
- § 14
- § 14
- § 14
- § 14
- § 14
- § 14
- § 14
- § 14
- § 14
- § 14
- § 14
- § 14
- § 14
- § 14
- § 14
Full Text
462 charsThe Court of Appeals found that the landlords here might be liable for third party injuries because they knew their tenant would have a dangerous animal on the premises before they rented their property to her. This prior knowledge of the landlords, however, has no significance. Under Washington law, the landlords would not be liable to the tenant for the tiger’s attack so should not be liable to third parties for injuries inflicted by the animal. See Regan,