Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Pham v. Corbett, 187 Wash. App. 816 (2015)

Citation
Pham v. Corbett, 187 Wash. App. 816 (2015)
Parent Document
Pham v. Corbett, 187 Wash. App. 816 (2015)
Jurisdiction
Washington (state)
Effective Date
2015-05-26

Other Sections in This Document (66)

Full Text

517 chars
¶32 Pham next argues that he was never notified that the unit will “be condemned” or will “be unlawful to occupy.” Br. of Appellant at 17. The Tenants argue that Pham received three letters informing him that the units were illegal. The record shows that Pham received notice that the dwelling was unlawful to occupy because (1) it was permitted only for use as a triplex and (2) its condition was substandard and violated multiple provisions of the housing code. The initial notice of violation states that Pham must