AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp. v. Stange, 631 N.W.2d 444 (2001)
- Citation
- AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp. v. Stange, 631 N.W.2d 444 (2001)
- Parent Document
- AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp. v. Stange, 631 N.W.2d 444 (2001)
- Jurisdiction
- Minnesota (state)
- Effective Date
- 2001-07-24
Other Sections in This Document (20)
- AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp. v. Stange, 631 N.W.2d 444 (2001)
- AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp. v. Stange, 631 N.W.2d 444 (2001)
- AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp. v. Stange, 631 N.W.2d 444 (2001)
- AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp. v. Stange, 631 N.W.2d 444 (2001)
- AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp. v. Stange, 631 N.W.2d 444 (2001)
- AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp. v. Stange, 631 N.W.2d 444 (2001)
- AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp. v. Stange, 631 N.W.2d 444 (2001)
- AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp. v. Stange, 631 N.W.2d 444 (2001)
- AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp. v. Stange, 631 N.W.2d 444 (2001)
- AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp. v. Stange, 631 N.W.2d 444 (2001)
- AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp. v. Stange, 631 N.W.2d 444 (2001)
- AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp. v. Stange, 631 N.W.2d 444 (2001)
- AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp. v. Stange, 631 N.W.2d 444 (2001)
- AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp. v. Stange, 631 N.W.2d 444 (2001)
- AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp. v. Stange, 631 N.W.2d 444 (2001)
- AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp. v. Stange, 631 N.W.2d 444 (2001)
- AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp. v. Stange, 631 N.W.2d 444 (2001)
- AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp. v. Stange, 631 N.W.2d 444 (2001)
- AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp. v. Stange, 631 N.W.2d 444 (2001)
- AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp. v. Stange, 631 N.W.2d 444 (2001)
Full Text
646 charsIn January 2000, after expiration of the statutory period for redeeming property, respondent AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corporation initiated eviction proceedings in Crow Wing County District Court against appellants Duane and Angela Stange. In their answer, appellants counterclaimed and asserted affirmative defenses related to the underlying mortgage foreclosure. Appellants alleged that respondent was not entitled to possession of the property because it breached the mortgage contract by (a) refusing in bad faith to accept payment; (b) failing to give notice of default and acceleration; (c) preventing appellants from redeeming the *445