INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

riley v. dempsey (2023)

Citation
riley v. dempsey (2023)
Parent Document
riley v. dempsey (2023)
Jurisdiction
Vermont (state)
Effective Date
2023-11-07
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/9440801/riley-v-dempsey/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (47)

Full Text

672 chars 
For example, the term of the second lease expired on August 31, 2003 (Finding 9). After the
lease expired, Mr. Dempsey remained in the premises and continued to pay monthly rent (Finding
6), but later there was a “somewhat sudden and premature termination of the lease” (Finding 19).
These findings are not contradictory. After the written lease expired on August 31, 2003, Mr:
Dempsey remained in the premises and continued to pay monthly rent; at that point the implied lease
became a month-to-month rental. Nevertheless, Mr. Riley insisted, over the Dempseys’ objections,
that he had to move back into his house; at some point the Dempseys agreed to be out of the house