Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Ferris v. Loucka (2015)

Citation
Ferris v. Loucka (2015)
Parent Document
Ferris v. Loucka (2015)
Jurisdiction
Vermont (state)
Effective Date
2015-06-25

Full Text

637 chars
The Small Claims Court’s finding that Mr. Loucka vacated the apartment on or before
June 4 is supported by the evidence. The evidence was clear that, by then, Mr. Loucka was
living somewhere else, had returned the key, and had some communications with Mr. Audette to
the effect that he would need to leave some property behind and no longer wanted it. It is not
clear whether the possessions left behind were more substantial than what Mr. Loucka claims to
have discussed with Mr. Audette. There was no evidence, however, that any abandoned property
was so substantial as to reasonably indicate his continuing occupancy of the apartment.