Woods v. Cobleigh, 75 F. Supp. 125 (1947)
- Citation
- Woods v. Cobleigh, 75 F. Supp. 125 (1947)
- Parent Document
- Woods v. Cobleigh, 75 F. Supp. 125 (1947)
- Jurisdiction
- New Hampshire (state)
- Effective Date
- 1947-12-19
Other Sections in This Document (15)
- Woods v. Cobleigh, 75 F. Supp. 125 (1947)
- Woods v. Cobleigh, 75 F. Supp. 125 (1947)
- Woods v. Cobleigh, 75 F. Supp. 125 (1947)
- Woods v. Cobleigh, 75 F. Supp. 125 (1947)
- Woods v. Cobleigh, 75 F. Supp. 125 (1947)
- Woods v. Cobleigh, 75 F. Supp. 125 (1947)
- Woods v. Cobleigh, 75 F. Supp. 125 (1947)
- Woods v. Cobleigh, 75 F. Supp. 125 (1947)
- Woods v. Cobleigh, 75 F. Supp. 125 (1947)
- Woods v. Cobleigh, 75 F. Supp. 125 (1947)
- Woods v. Cobleigh, 75 F. Supp. 125 (1947)
- Woods v. Cobleigh, 75 F. Supp. 125 (1947)
- Woods v. Cobleigh, 75 F. Supp. 125 (1947)
- Woods v. Cobleigh, 75 F. Supp. 125 (1947)
- Woods v. Cobleigh, 75 F. Supp. 125 (1947)
Full Text
615 charsAlthough whatever transpired during the so-called “holiday” was excluded from the operation of the Act by the savings clause thereof, the reenactment revived and made effective all directives in force as of June 30, 1946. It follows that upon such revival, the rental contracts being in conflict with the pertinent regulations must *129be subordinated thereto, for they cannot supersede or stand in the way of the Act, which is an exercise of the Government’s war power and designed to promote the general welfare. Taylor v. Brown, Em.App., 137 F.2d 654, certiorari denied, 320 U.S. 787, 64 S.Ct. 194, 88 L.Ed. 473.