Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Citation
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Parent Document
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Jurisdiction
- New Hampshire (state)
- Effective Date
- 2025-07-17
Other Sections in This Document (24)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
Full Text
373 chars2
[¶7] On appeal, the plaintiffs challenge the trial court’s rulings that: (1)
the Notice requiring the plaintiffs to remove their manufactured housing unit
was not deficient because the plaintiffs were not entitled to 18 months’ notice
to remove their unit; and (2) the defendant did not violate RSA chapter 205-A
or engage in an unfair or deceptive trade practice.