DARBOUZE v. Champney, 8 A.3d 105 (2010)
- Citation
- DARBOUZE v. Champney, 8 A.3d 105 (2010)
- Parent Document
- DARBOUZE v. Champney, 8 A.3d 105 (2010)
- Jurisdiction
- New Hampshire (state)
- Effective Date
- 2010-09-17
Other Sections in This Document (28)
- DARBOUZE v. Champney, 8 A.3d 105 (2010)
- DARBOUZE v. Champney, 8 A.3d 105 (2010)
- DARBOUZE v. Champney, 8 A.3d 105 (2010)
- DARBOUZE v. Champney, 8 A.3d 105 (2010)
- DARBOUZE v. Champney, 8 A.3d 105 (2010)
- DARBOUZE v. Champney, 8 A.3d 105 (2010)
- DARBOUZE v. Champney, 8 A.3d 105 (2010)
- DARBOUZE v. Champney, 8 A.3d 105 (2010)
- DARBOUZE v. Champney, 8 A.3d 105 (2010)
- DARBOUZE v. Champney, 8 A.3d 105 (2010)
- DARBOUZE v. Champney, 8 A.3d 105 (2010)
- DARBOUZE v. Champney, 8 A.3d 105 (2010)
- DARBOUZE v. Champney, 8 A.3d 105 (2010)
- DARBOUZE v. Champney, 8 A.3d 105 (2010)
- DARBOUZE v. Champney, 8 A.3d 105 (2010)
- DARBOUZE v. Champney, 8 A.3d 105 (2010)
- DARBOUZE v. Champney, 8 A.3d 105 (2010)
- DARBOUZE v. Champney, 8 A.3d 105 (2010)
- DARBOUZE v. Champney, 8 A.3d 105 (2010)
- DARBOUZE v. Champney, 8 A.3d 105 (2010)
- DARBOUZE v. Champney, 8 A.3d 105 (2010)
- DARBOUZE v. Champney, 8 A.3d 105 (2010)
- DARBOUZE v. Champney, 8 A.3d 105 (2010)
- DARBOUZE v. Champney, 8 A.3d 105 (2010)
- DARBOUZE v. Champney, 8 A.3d 105 (2010)
- DARBOUZE v. Champney, 8 A.3d 105 (2010)
- DARBOUZE v. Champney, 8 A.3d 105 (2010)
- DARBOUZE v. Champney, 8 A.3d 105 (2010)
Full Text
435 charsJ.) in favor of the landlord, Jeanmax Darbouze. The trial court found that: (1) use of the words “Notice to Quit” rather than “Eviction Notice” was not fatally defective to the landlord’s action; (2) use of “Mrs. Nancy” or “Nancy” on the demand for rent and eviction notice, rather than the tenant’s full name, did not warrant dismissal of the action; and (3) the landlord provided seven days’ notice as required by statute. We affirm.