Melissa Natal v. GMPM Company & a. (2022)

Citation: Melissa Natal v. GMPM Company & a. (2022)
Parent Document: Melissa Natal v. GMPM Company & a. (2022)
Jurisdiction: New Hampshire (state)
Effective Date: 2022-04-01
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/6456928/melissa-natal-v-gmpm-company-a/ ↗

Full Text

755 chars

The defendant contends that the property was a “shared facility,” and,
therefore, RSA chapter 540-B allowed the defendant to remove the plaintiff
from the property after the 72-hour notice period. We note that RSA chapter
540-B provides for an eviction process separate from the judicial eviction
process outlined in RSA chapter 540. Under RSA 540-B:3, III, the owner of a
shared facility may terminate any tenancy for material breach of any rental
agreement. RSA 540-B:3, III. In such cases, the owner need only provide a
written 72-hour notice of eviction. Id. “The owner or agent of the owner may
take possession” of the property “at the end of the notice period.” RSA 540-
B:8. The owner may request the assistance of law enforcement if necessary.
Id.

Other Sections in This Document (26)

Full Text