Daryl Heneault v. Kenneth Lantini, 213 A.3d 410 (2019)

Citation: Daryl Heneault v. Kenneth Lantini, 213 A.3d 410 (2019)
Parent Document: Daryl Heneault v. Kenneth Lantini, 213 A.3d 410 (2019)
Jurisdiction: Rhode Island (state)
Effective Date: 2019-06-27
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4633548/daryl-heneault-v-kenneth-lantini/ ↗

Full Text

806 chars

1
  Although plaintiff signed the receipt agreement and lease agreement on behalf of GM Research
Group, Inc. (the name of which was corrected to GM Management, Inc. on the lease agreement
and was referred to as such in plaintiff’s complaint), the record reflects that plaintiff was the
successor-in-interest and assignee to the company. Moreover, Mr. Lantini is the principal of 1200
Hartford LLC. He personally signed the receipt agreement, but signed the lease agreement on
behalf of 1200 Hartford LLC.
2
  Subsequently, defendants filed an answer to the complaint and a counterclaim against plaintiff
alleging that plaintiff “has not fulfilled all his duties and obligations” under the lease agreement.
As such, defendants claimed that plaintiff’s actions constituted a default and a breach of the lease

Other Sections in This Document (199)

Full Text