Skip to main content

Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 837346 orderanopinion.pdf

Citation
Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 837346 orderanopinion.pdf
Jurisdiction
Washington (state)
Source verification
official_capture_completeness_unverified

Related Parts of This Source

Full Text

1,726 chars
VIRGINIA CHIU, an individual, and No. 83734-6-I
VINCENT LIEW, an individual,
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
Appellants, RECONSIDERATION AND
WITHDRAWING AND
v. SUBSTITUTING OPINION

BRIAN HOSKINS and the marital
community thereof,

Respondent.

The appellants, Virginia Chiu and Vincent Liew, and the respondent, Brian

Hoskins, have filed motions for reconsideration of the opinion filed on July 10, 2023. The

court has determined that the motions should be denied, but the opinion should be

withdrawn, and a substitute opinion filed; now, therefore, it is hereby

ORDERED that the motions for reconsideration are denied; and it is further

ORDERED that the opinion filed on July 10, 2023 is withdrawn; and it is further

ORDERED that a substitute published opinion shall be filed.
For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/wareports/.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

VIRGINIA CHIU, an individual, and No. 83734-6-I
VINCENT LIEW, an individual,
DIVISION ONE
Appellants,
PUBLISHED OPINION
v.

BRIAN HOSKINS and the marital
community thereof,

Respondent.

FELDMAN, J. — Virginia Chiu and Vincent Liew (Tenants) appeal the trial

court’s order on summary judgment, findings of facts and conclusions of law, and

judgment in this landlord-tenant dispute. Tenants claim that their landlord, Brian

Hoskins, failed to comply with various provisions in the Residential Landlord-

Tenant Act of 1973 (RLTA), ch. 59.18 RCW, and chapter 7.24 (Rental Agreement

Regulation) of the Seattle Municipal Code (SMC). The trial court concluded that

Hoskins failed to comply with several such provisions but declined to award

damages because it concluded that Tenants had not suffered actual damages.