Gooding Realty Corp. v. Bristol Bay CVS, Inc., 763 A.2d 650 (2000)
- Citation
- Gooding Realty Corp. v. Bristol Bay CVS, Inc., 763 A.2d 650 (2000)
- Parent Document
- Gooding Realty Corp. v. Bristol Bay CVS, Inc., 763 A.2d 650 (2000)
- Jurisdiction
- Rhode Island (state)
- Effective Date
- 2000-12-26
Other Sections in This Document (17)
- Gooding Realty Corp. v. Bristol Bay CVS, Inc., 763 A.2d 650 (2000)
- Gooding Realty Corp. v. Bristol Bay CVS, Inc., 763 A.2d 650 (2000)
- Gooding Realty Corp. v. Bristol Bay CVS, Inc., 763 A.2d 650 (2000)
- Gooding Realty Corp. v. Bristol Bay CVS, Inc., 763 A.2d 650 (2000)
- Gooding Realty Corp. v. Bristol Bay CVS, Inc., 763 A.2d 650 (2000)
- Gooding Realty Corp. v. Bristol Bay CVS, Inc., 763 A.2d 650 (2000)
- Gooding Realty Corp. v. Bristol Bay CVS, Inc., 763 A.2d 650 (2000)
- Gooding Realty Corp. v. Bristol Bay CVS, Inc., 763 A.2d 650 (2000)
- Gooding Realty Corp. v. Bristol Bay CVS, Inc., 763 A.2d 650 (2000)
- Gooding Realty Corp. v. Bristol Bay CVS, Inc., 763 A.2d 650 (2000)
- Gooding Realty Corp. v. Bristol Bay CVS, Inc., 763 A.2d 650 (2000)
- Gooding Realty Corp. v. Bristol Bay CVS, Inc., 763 A.2d 650 (2000)
- Gooding Realty Corp. v. Bristol Bay CVS, Inc., 763 A.2d 650 (2000)
- Gooding Realty Corp. v. Bristol Bay CVS, Inc., 763 A.2d 650 (2000)
- Gooding Realty Corp. v. Bristol Bay CVS, Inc., 763 A.2d 650 (2000)
- Gooding Realty Corp. v. Bristol Bay CVS, Inc., 763 A.2d 650 (2000)
- Gooding Realty Corp. v. Bristol Bay CVS, Inc., 763 A.2d 650 (2000)
Full Text
725 charsCVS filed a timely notice of appeal to the Superior Court and also filed a bond in the full amount of the judgment, plus interest, costs, and attorney’s fees. This bond was secured by a deposit in the registry of the court in a sum exceeding $40,000. Had a trial taken place in the Superior Court, CVS would have presented evidence that the keys to the Gooding premises were returned to a representative of the landlord on September 27, 1999. CVS was of the opinion that it had ceased to be a tenant at the end of the period of the lease, but that any doubt concerning its tenancy was removed when the keys were returned on September 27. It, therefore, believed that it had no obligation to pay rent for the month of October.