Skip to main content

Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 829769.pdf

Citation
Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 829769.pdf
Jurisdiction
Washington (state)
Source verification
official_capture_completeness_unverified

Full Text

1,609 chars
to enforce any provision contained herein. . . Resident shall be responsible for and shall

pay as additional rent, all costs, expenses and attorney’s fees incurred by Owner.”

While the language of the lease is unilateral, RCW 4.84.330 converts the term to a

bilateral fee provision. When a lease provides for one party to receive attorney fees and

costs incurred to enforce the provisions of the lease, “the prevailing party, whether he or

she is the party specified in the contract or lease or not, shall be entitled to reasonable

attorneys’ fees in addition to costs and necessary disbursements.” RCW 4.84.330.

The only issue on appeal is the validity of the lease provision forfeiting the

security deposit upon abandonment of the lease. Gebreseralse is the prevailing party on

this issue and entitled to her fees on appeal both in this court and, because we reverse

the King County Superior Court’s decision, on her RALJ appeal. 5

5
Because we award fees under the terms of the lease, we need not address the other
grounds raised by the parties.

11
For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/wareports/.
No. 82976-9-I/12

We reverse the superior court’s judgment in favor of CDR, including the award of

attorney fees and costs. We remand to the superior court and direct it to vacate its

judgment and remand to the district court to reinstate its order and to enter judgment,

accounting for attorney fees awarded to CDR on the initial action and to Gebreseralse

on both the RALJ appeal to the superior court and to this court pursuant to RAP 18.1(i).

WE CONCUR:

12