Grotta v. Grotta, 01-5494 (2002) (2002)
- Citation
- Grotta v. Grotta, 01-5494 (2002) (2002)
- Parent Document
- Grotta v. Grotta, 01-5494 (2002) (2002)
- Jurisdiction
- Rhode Island (state)
- Effective Date
- 2002-09-20
Other Sections in This Document (29)
- Grotta v. Grotta, 01-5494 (2002) (2002)
- Grotta v. Grotta, 01-5494 (2002) (2002)
- Grotta v. Grotta, 01-5494 (2002) (2002)
- Grotta v. Grotta, 01-5494 (2002) (2002)
- Grotta v. Grotta, 01-5494 (2002) (2002)
- Grotta v. Grotta, 01-5494 (2002) (2002)
- Grotta v. Grotta, 01-5494 (2002) (2002)
- Grotta v. Grotta, 01-5494 (2002) (2002)
- Grotta v. Grotta, 01-5494 (2002) (2002)
- Grotta v. Grotta, 01-5494 (2002) (2002)
- Grotta v. Grotta, 01-5494 (2002) (2002)
- Grotta v. Grotta, 01-5494 (2002) (2002)
- Grotta v. Grotta, 01-5494 (2002) (2002)
- Grotta v. Grotta, 01-5494 (2002) (2002)
- Grotta v. Grotta, 01-5494 (2002) (2002)
- Grotta v. Grotta, 01-5494 (2002) (2002)
- Grotta v. Grotta, 01-5494 (2002) (2002)
- Grotta v. Grotta, 01-5494 (2002) (2002)
- Grotta v. Grotta, 01-5494 (2002) (2002)
- Grotta v. Grotta, 01-5494 (2002) (2002)
- Grotta v. Grotta, 01-5494 (2002) (2002)
- Grotta v. Grotta, 01-5494 (2002) (2002)
- Grotta v. Grotta, 01-5494 (2002) (2002)
- Grotta v. Grotta, 01-5494 (2002) (2002)
- Grotta v. Grotta, 01-5494 (2002) (2002)
- Grotta v. Grotta, 01-5494 (2002) (2002)
- Grotta v. Grotta, 01-5494 (2002) (2002)
- Grotta v. Grotta, 01-5494 (2002) (2002)
- Grotta v. Grotta, 01-5494 (2002) (2002)
Full Text
385 charsBased upon the facts proven at trial, this Court held that a rental agreement existed by implication between the parties. Based upon the teaching in Tambor v. Miller, it is axiomatic that unless defendant was a tenant she would not have been entitled to any damages on her claim for unjust enrichment arising out of plaintiffs' claim relying on the Residential Landlord and Tenant Act.