Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Citation
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Jurisdiction
- Washington (state)
- Source verification
- official_capture_completeness_unverified
- Original Source
- https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/796925.pdf ↗
Related Parts of This Source
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 796925.pdf
Full Text
1,800 charsCITY OF SEATTLE, SEATTLE OFFICE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS, and SEATTLE DIVISION ONE OFFICE OF LABOR STANDARDS, No. 79692-5-I Respondents, PUBLISHED OPINION v. AMERICAN HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC., GIDEON OYELEKE, and the SEATTLE HEARING EXAMINER, Appellants. DWYER, J. — This is an employment discrimination case involving American Healthcare Services, Inc.’s (AHS) alleged discrimination and retaliation against Jasmine Pope premised on her request for a reasonable accommodation for her memory related disability. The City of Seattle (City) brought an action against AHS, on Pope’s behalf, before a city hearing examiner, alleging violations of Seattle’s Fair Employment Practices Ordinance, codified at chapter 14.04 Seattle Municipal Code (SMC). The hearing examiner dismissed the case on summary judgment. The dismissal was subsequently reversed by the superior court. This appeal presents two questions: (1) what is the proper procedure for seeking judicial review of decisions of Seattle hearing examiners regarding violations of employment discrimination provisions of the SMC, and (2) did the City proffer evidence demonstrating that a genuine dispute of material fact For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/wareports/. No. 79692-5-I/2 precluded summary judgment? We hold that appeals from a Seattle hearing examiner’s decision regarding alleged violations of chapter 14.04 SMC are governed by the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), chapter 34.05 RCW, and that the City presented evidence establishing a genuine dispute of material fact, precluding summary judgment. Thus, we affirm the superior court. I Jasmine Pope suffers from the aftereffects of a frontotemporal craniotomy she received in 2014 to correct multiple brain aneurysms, which include