Centennial Brewing Co. v. Rouleau, 49 Mont. 490 (1914)
- Citation
- Centennial Brewing Co. v. Rouleau, 49 Mont. 490 (1914)
- Parent Document
- Centennial Brewing Co. v. Rouleau, 49 Mont. 490 (1914)
- Jurisdiction
- Montana (state)
- Effective Date
- 1914-10-19
Other Sections in This Document (16)
- Centennial Brewing Co. v. Rouleau, 49 Mont. 490 (1914)
- Centennial Brewing Co. v. Rouleau, 49 Mont. 490 (1914)
- Centennial Brewing Co. v. Rouleau, 49 Mont. 490 (1914)
- Centennial Brewing Co. v. Rouleau, 49 Mont. 490 (1914)
- Centennial Brewing Co. v. Rouleau, 49 Mont. 490 (1914)
- Centennial Brewing Co. v. Rouleau, 49 Mont. 490 (1914)
- Centennial Brewing Co. v. Rouleau, 49 Mont. 490 (1914)
- Centennial Brewing Co. v. Rouleau, 49 Mont. 490 (1914)
- Centennial Brewing Co. v. Rouleau, 49 Mont. 490 (1914)
- Centennial Brewing Co. v. Rouleau, 49 Mont. 490 (1914)
- Centennial Brewing Co. v. Rouleau, 49 Mont. 490 (1914)
- Centennial Brewing Co. v. Rouleau, 49 Mont. 490 (1914)
- Centennial Brewing Co. v. Rouleau, 49 Mont. 490 (1914)
- Centennial Brewing Co. v. Rouleau, 49 Mont. 490 (1914)
- Centennial Brewing Co. v. Rouleau, 49 Mont. 490 (1914)
- Centennial Brewing Co. v. Rouleau, 49 Mont. 490 (1914)
Full Text
1,112 charsto be restored to possession is complete at the expiration of the term, whether the contract of lease specifically so stipulates or not; for the expiration of the term *500is notice to the lessee that his right to occupy the property has ceased, and the duty arises at once to restore the possession to his landlord, without demand or notice. Subdivisions 2, 3 and 4 of the section define the rights of the parties under the circumstances stated in them, and impose upon the landlord the duty to give notice and make demand as therein indicated; but these provisions have no relation to the rights and obligations of the parties as they exist under the circumstances covered by the provisions of subdivision 1. Under this subdivision the giving of notice of any kind or the making of a demand is not required as a condition precedent to the bringing of the action. To read the requirements of any of these subdivisions into subdivision 1, would be to add to the definition of' unlawful detainer therein laid down elements which the legislature thought it not necessary to include. This we are not required to do.