Skip to main content

Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 720287.pdf

Citation
Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 720287.pdf
Jurisdiction
Washington (state)
Source verification
official_capture_completeness_unverified

Full Text

1,770 chars
In Title 29A RCW, the legislature has gone into great detail to ensure that

the process of collecting, counting, storing, and ultimately destroying ballots

achieves the constitutional mandate for a secret ballot. The only statutory

provision for copying of ballots is found in RCW 29A.60.125. The statute permits

duplication "only if the intent of the voter's marks on the ballot is clear and the

electronic voting equipment might not otherwise properly tally the ballotto reflect

the intent of the voter." Ballots must be duplicated by teams of two people, and

those people must record their actions in writing to create and maintain an audit

trail of the actions they take. RCW 29A.60.125. Original and duplicate ballots

must be sealed in secure storage at all times, "except during duplication,

inspection by the canvassing board, or tabulation." RCW 29A.60.125.
             
No. 72028-7-1/7

The statutes governing the handling and storage of ballots must be

interpreted in the context provided by the constitutional mandate for ballot

secrecy. In that context, the term "ballot" does not just refer to the physical

document on which the voter's choices are marked. A facsimile, a physical copy,

an electronic record or image file of the physical document on which the voter

places a mark is just as much a "ballot" as the physical document itself. The

statutes do not in any way suggest that the legislature meant to allow electronic

or digital images of ballots to be more available for public inspection and copying

than the original ballots. We interpret the fourfold definition of "ballot" as

reflecting legislative intent to define "ballot" as broadly as possible to fulfill the