Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Bittle v. Commissioner of Social Services, 48 Conn. App. 711 (1998)

Citation
Bittle v. Commissioner of Social Services, 48 Conn. App. 711 (1998)
Parent Document
Bittle v. Commissioner of Social Services, 48 Conn. App. 711 (1998)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
1998-05-19

Full Text

752 chars
“On appeal, it is the function of this court to determine whether the decision of the trial court is clearly erroneous. . . . [WJhere the legal conclusions of the court are challenged, we must determine whether they are legally and logically correct and whether they find support in the facts set out in the memorandum of decision . . . .” Pandolphe’s Auto Parts, Inc. v. Manchester, 181 Conn. 217, 221, 435 A.2d 24 (1980). “We do not examine the record to determine whether the trier *714of fact could have reached a conclusion other than the one reached. Rather, we focus on the conclusion of the trial court, as well as the method by which it arrived at that conclusion, to determine whether it is legally correct and factually supported.” Id., 222.