Skip to main content

Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 701282.pdf

Citation
Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 701282.pdf
Jurisdiction
Washington (state)
Source verification
official_capture_completeness_unverified

Full Text

1,796 chars
testified, however, that he could not determine from the photographs whether the

tread on Currier's tires would require that the truck be placed out of service.

Currier's operation of his truck with expired license tabs was a civil infraction

subject to a citation. NSI presented no evidence that it ever terminated any

driver's contract because of equipment or licensing issues or traffic infractions.

The trial court did not find the testimony of Sleeth and Franssen credible.

This court will not disturb a damages award unless the award falls outside

the range of substantial evidence in the record, shocks the conscience of the

court, or appears to be the result of passion or prejudice.42 And this court

strongly presumes the trial court's verdict is correct.43 Because substantial

evidence supports the trial court's findings, we affirm the court's award of

damages, attorney fees, and costs.

Appellate Costs and Attorney Fees

Currier requests attorney fees and costs on appeal. Under RAP 18.1 and

RCW 49.60.030(2), the prevailing party is entitled to appellate fees and costs.44

42 Bunch v. King County Dep't of Youth Servs., 155 Wn.2d 165, 179, 116
P.3d 381 (2005); Burchfiel, 149 Wn. App. at 484.
43 Bunch, 155 Wn.2d at 179; Burchfiel, 149 Wn. App. at 484.
44 Allison, 118Wn.2dat98.

-17-
             
NO. 70128-2-1/18

We award Currier appellate costs and reasonable attorney fees, subject to his

compliance with RAP 18.1(d).

CONCLUSION

Because substantial evidence supports the trial court's findings of fact

regarding liability and damages and those findings support the court's

conclusions of law, we affirm and award Currier his costs and reasonable

attorney fees on appeal.

rl4~0Uc^vtt
WE CONCUR: