Kufferman v. Fairfield University, 5 Conn. App. 118 (1985)
- Citation
- Kufferman v. Fairfield University, 5 Conn. App. 118 (1985)
- Parent Document
- Kufferman v. Fairfield University, 5 Conn. App. 118 (1985)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 1985-08-27
Other Sections in This Document (13)
- Kufferman v. Fairfield University, 5 Conn. App. 118 (1985)
- Kufferman v. Fairfield University, 5 Conn. App. 118 (1985)
- Kufferman v. Fairfield University, 5 Conn. App. 118 (1985)
- Kufferman v. Fairfield University, 5 Conn. App. 118 (1985)
- Kufferman v. Fairfield University, 5 Conn. App. 118 (1985)
- Kufferman v. Fairfield University, 5 Conn. App. 118 (1985)
- Kufferman v. Fairfield University, 5 Conn. App. 118 (1985)
- Kufferman v. Fairfield University, 5 Conn. App. 118 (1985)
- Kufferman v. Fairfield University, 5 Conn. App. 118 (1985)
- Kufferman v. Fairfield University, 5 Conn. App. 118 (1985)
- Kufferman v. Fairfield University, 5 Conn. App. 118 (1985)
- Kufferman v. Fairfield University, 5 Conn. App. 118 (1985)
- Kufferman v. Fairfield University, 5 Conn. App. 118 (1985)
Full Text
591 charsThe court found, from the evidence adduced under the counterclaim, that the answer to both of these questions was negative. It found that the tenancy terminated on May 30, 1982, but that the only notification given to the defendant regarding the security deposit or damages was a letter dated July 26,1982.* **4 The court *123found, therefore, that the plaintiffs violated the provisions of General Statutes § 47a-21 (d) (2) and were liable to the defendant for twice the value of its security deposit. We cannot say that the court’s conclusion, based on the evidence, was clearly erroneous.