Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Boccanfuso v. Daghoghi, 193 Conn. App. 137 (2019)

Citation
Boccanfuso v. Daghoghi, 193 Conn. App. 137 (2019)
Parent Document
Boccanfuso v. Daghoghi, 193 Conn. App. 137 (2019)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
2019-10-01

Full Text

777 chars
Summary process action brought to the Superior
Court in the judicial district of Stamford-Norwalk, Nor-
walk Housing Session, and tried to the court, Rodri-
guez, J.; judgment for the plaintiffs, from which the
defendants appealed to this court; thereafter, the court,
Rodriguez, J., denied the defendants’ motion for articu-
lation; subsequently, this court granted in part the
defendants’ motion for review and the court, Rodri-
guez, J., issued an articulation; thereafter, this court
granted in part the defendants’ motion for review, and
the court, Rodriguez, J., issued an articulation.
Affirmed.
  Eugene E. Cederbaum, with whom was Ryan Dris-
coll, for the appellants (defendants).
   Matthew B. Woods, for the appellees (plaintiffs).
                          Opinion